OCZ's Octane SSD: Indilinx Everest, Up to 1TB in a Consumer Drive
by Anand Lal Shimpi on October 20, 2011 9:00 AM ESTIn March, OCZ signed a definitive agreement to acquire Indilinx, the SSD controller company that pretty much dominated the value segment in 2009 before Intel got aggressive on pricing and SandForce took over the high-end. Indilinx was late on releasing its 6Gbps SSD controller prior to the acquisition and had all but fallen off the radar as most of its partners jumped ship to SandForce. OCZ scooped up the company with hopes of developing its own controllers and rising above the memory-manufacturer-turned-SSD-player crowd.
SandForce has obviously extended its reach since OCZ announced its intentions, partnering with many of OCZ's competitors in an attempt to expand its reach as well as lessen dependence on OCZ. As a customer turned competitor, SF like many of us knew that an OCZ SSD boasting a new Indilinx controller was in the works. Today we have the first details on that solution and it's called Octane.
Based on the Indilinx Everest controller, OCZ is touting incompressible data and sustained write performance as the two major strengths of Octane - obviously a jab SandForce and traditional SSD weaknesses. The controller is paired up with up to a 512MB DRAM cache, indicating that it is taking the more traditional route of storing both user data as well as page mapping tables in DRAM. There's no mention of power protection circuitry to flush the cache contents to NAND in the event of a power failure, but given the target market for these drives I don't suppose we'll see such a feature.
The Octane will be available in two discrete versions: one with 6Gbps SATA support and one limited to 3Gbps (SATA 3.0 and 2.0, respectively). The 6Gbps version will ship with 25nm IMFT synchronous NAND, while the 3Gbps version will use 25nm IMFT async NAND similar to the Vertex 3/Agility 3 divide today. Sequential read/write speeds are competitive at 560/400 MBps, while 4KB random read/write speeds are quoted at 45K/25K.
Capacities start at 128GB and will go all the way up to 1TB. OCZ is expecting pricing to fall somewhere within the $1.10 - $1.30 per GB range, which would put a 128GB drive at no more than $166 (in line with current Vertex 2 pricing) and a 1TB drive at just over $1300. Spare area is set at the standard ~7% you get from the GiB to GB conversion. No word on whether or not there's any additional NAND set aside for redundancy.
The Everest controller features 8 NAND channels and up to 16-way interleaving. With 25nm NAND that means peak performance should be achievable with the 128GB model, with the larger drives just offering higher capacity and no additional performance. TRIM is of course supported. OCZ indicates support for both standard wear leveling and background garbage collection (presumably at idle time).
The first Octane drives will be available in the channel starting November 1st. I've already dispatched a huge list of questions to OCZ about the controller and the drive's architecture so I'll update this post as I get any new information. And of course, once we get a review sample I'll begin extensive testing.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
50 Comments
View All Comments
jdietz - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
Estimated cost $1500 ($1.5 per GB).Guspaz - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
I paid ~$800 for my 160GB Intel x25-m G1 (~$5/GB), and OCZ is announcing pricing of $1.10 - $1.30 per gig, giving a 1TB price of ~$1100-1300. A hefty improvement, if you ask me; it won't be long before the price of a 1TB drive drops below what I paid for a 160GB drive.darckhart - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
finally. the return of indilinx. yay.James5mith - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
A few thoughts:- As long as these drives offer middle of the road performance, we all win. To OCZ: Please don't let these drives suck. That's all I ask. I'm not asking for top tier performance. I'm asking for solid,reliable performance. Something to get my parents on SSD's.
- They will drive down the cost of competing products, and offer a budget alternative. $1/GB is the "golden" price point a lot of people have been holding out for before purchasing an SSD.
- No caps on the drive == no problem.
If you are running a computer without a UPS you've allocated your money poorly.
FunBunny2 - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
You'd better have one that switches real fast.Paul Tarnowski - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
Not really when you have a decent PSU and are running well within its power envelope (<70% load or so). I have an old OCZ that kept my computer running when the power flickered (before I got a UPS) despite everything without a built-in battery resetting.retrospooty - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
"also i've had ocz vertex2 and 3 and never had any issues. "Me too, I had a vertex, vertex 2 and now Agility3 without a single issue. Customer response to OCZ's SSD's has been overwhelmingly positive, what is that guy even talking about?
sanguy - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
Go read their forums, plenty of issues... Even Anand has written about them in detail.Stuttering Vertex-1. Vertex-2 firmware issues. Vertex-3 BSOD issues.
MadMan007 - Friday, October 21, 2011 - link
If 1% of hundreds of thousands of people compain it will make a forum absolutely blow up. I don't know why everyone who makes it sound likel literally every OCZ SSD customer has a problem can't figure this out.Zak - Thursday, October 20, 2011 - link
I won't buy another SSD for a while. I've been so turned off. When SSDs came out they were supposed to be awesome. But soon we learned that Windows XP has stuttering and other problems with SSDs. Then we learned that SSDs have problems with performance loss when heavily used. OK, so TRIM came to the rescue. Everybody rejoiced. But then we learned that TRIM requires new drives, compatible controllers and compatible OS and it doesn't work with RAID controllers. So we bought new SSDs, new motherboards and Windows 7 brought us TRIM support. Everybody rejoiced. Then we learned about the compressible versus incompressible data performance gap and issues. Then the SandForce firmware shenanigans saw the light of day. What's next? When will it be safe to buy an SSD and not to worry about yet some other issue surfacing? They still cost way too much to have all these issues and such short warranties, they need to come with 5 year warranties like most upper end hard drives. Two of my original OCZ SSDs died few months after their 2 year warranty.